Designing for Uncertainty

/in , , , , , , /by

How to Build A Resilient Organization in a Shaky Economy

Uncertainty isn’t a temporary disruption anymore—it’s the new background noise of doing business. Tariffs shift markets overnight, massive government layoffs ripple through industries, and investment slows as caution takes hold. And if it’s not these specific uncertainties, rest assured, the changing world will offer up others to take their place.

Many organizations are structured for predictable growth and efficiency—but that model cracks under pressure. One of the reasons organizations struggle with responsiveness is because they are built for stability, not agility.

So how do you design for a world where the ground is always shifting?

1. Build for Flexibility, Not Just Efficiency

Highly optimized org charts look good on paper—but they tend to collapse when circumstances change. Instead, consider flatter structures, cross-functional teams, and role fluidity. Think less about locking people into permanent roles and more about how teams can self-organize to solve emerging problems. This doesn’t mean you need to completely remove the management structure. It does mean you need to lead for empowerment, not control.

2. Create Distributed Decision-Making

In volatile times, centralized decisions move too slowly. Flatter organizations and more fluid roles needs to include distributed decision-making and autonomy so you can respond quickly in a shifting economy. Push decision-making authority closer to the action—equip leaders at every level with the clarity and trust to act quickly. Ensure alignment by creating guardrails for action with a clear vision and purpose, expressed values, and simple guidelines that inform decision making. Speed and clarity are your competitive advantages.

3. Design for Scenario Planning

A good org design helps leaders ask: “What if…?” rather than scramble to respond once something happens. Build routines for scenario planning into your leadership rhythms. Let the organization know this is part of how you are leading. Amidst uncertainty, the more people understand you’re planning for a variety of potential futures, the more their concern about the unknown diminishes. Structure your organization to flex without breaking when the unexpected arrives.

4. Reduce Internal Friction

In times of uncertainty, even minor bottlenecks become major liabilities. Look at your workflows, approval processes, and communication norms. Are they built for clarity and momentum—or control and caution? You’ll need more of the former.

Bottom Line:

Resilient organizations don’t guess right about the future. They’re just better at responding when the future surprises them. They can respond because they have proactively prepared. Design yours with that reality in mind.

How to Prepare for Growth Even as You Recalibrate

/in , , , , , , /by

The Strategic Pullback: Positioning Your Organization for What’s Next

Our shareholders, our boards, and we, as executives, continually focus on growth — bigger markets, expanded teams, new investments. But what happens when the smartest move isn’t pushing forward, but pulling back?

The most effective leaders understand that growth isn’t just about scaling up—it’s about structuring for what comes next. Sometimes, that means making tough decisions now—restructuring teams, streamlining operations, or refocusing priorities—to create the right conditions for future expansion.

 

The Both/And of Smart Growth

Too often, organizations get caught in either/or thinking:

  • Either we grow aggressively or we restructure and slow down.
  • Either we hire more talent or we optimize what we already have.
  • Either we expand into new markets or we strengthen our core business.

The key is to not accept these false choices but instead to think in terms of Both/And:

  • How do we redesign now to accelerate growth next quarter or next year?
  • Where can we streamline today to scale smarter tomorrow?
  • What strategic moves position us for long-term success, not just short-term wins?

Key Considerations for Recalibrating for Growth

If you’re rethinking your structure now to enable future success, consider these essential factors:

  • Talent Realignment: Are your key people in the right roles for where the business is heading? Growth isn’t just about hiring—it’s about ensuring your current team is positioned to drive impact. You shouldn’t be using a chainsaw or mandating that every department must reduce staffing by 10%. Strategically recalibrating means assessing what parts of the organization create the most significant impact and using that to inform decisions.

I worked with a client who had been focused on aggressive hiring after the pandemic to have the staff they needed to serve their customers. The impact of their talent acquisition function was consequential. The next year, the need to staff up decreased substantially. They also faced revenue headwinds. Reducing their talent acquisition staff numbers while growing their regional management staff produced the realignment they needed. The realignment was nuanced.

  • Operational Efficiency: Where can you simplify processes, remove redundancies, or reallocate resources to improve execution without adding complexity? Engage the people closest to the work. A company was looking to achieve around $6mil in savings. Rather than simply having the executive team determine the savings opportunities, they established a process for the entire employee base to submit potential opportunities for savings. Finance led the vetting process for the ideas, their reasonableness, and impact. Rather than $6mil in savings, the company achieved over $20mil.
  • Strategic Focus: Do you need to rethink yours?Recalibrating requires clear prioritization—focusing only on what moves the business forward. But businesses should look beyond just revenue or EBIDTA.  Will an enhanced customer experience be the key?  Will it be creating the infrastructure that was put on the back burner during your last sprint towards aggressive bottom line results?
  • Cultural Alignment: Change—even strategic recalibration—can unsettle teams. Are you effectively communicating why these shifts are happening and how they set the organization up for success? Even the word recalibration can create negative perceptions. Think like the people being impacted by the cultural alignment. How would it feel to be in their shoes?  What questions would it raise?  What concerns would they have? Even senior leadership teams with the best intentions aren’t always good at communicating about change.
  • Financial Positioning: Scaling too fast can create risk. Are you balancing short-term financial discipline with long-term investment in the right growth levers? Consider various scenarios and their implications.

Recalibration is Not a Retreat

If you’re reorganizing, restructuring, or even pulling back in certain areas, don’t mistake it for a retreat. It’s a recalibration. And if done right, it puts you in a position to move faster, execute better, and grow stronger when the time is right.

Your Next Move:

The most effective leaders design for the future while managing the present. If you’re making structural changes now—or considering them—how are you ensuring they set you up for real growth next quarter, next year, and beyond?

We’re working with clients right now who are doing the same. Let’s talk about how to balance today’s realities with tomorrow’s opportunities.

Schedule a conversation to explore how strategic organizational design can fuel your next stage of growth.

The Importance of Transparency in Leadership Communication

/in , , , , /by

Because Secrets Create Silos, and Silos Kill Trust

In the age of information overload, being a secretive leader isn’t just outdated—it’s dangerous. People can smell a lack of transparency from a mile away, and nothing kills trust faster. If you want your leaders to be truly effective, transparency isn’t optional; it’s fundamental. Gone are the days when leaders could get away with cryptic decisions and behind-the-scenes power moves. Now, transparency is the cornerstone of trust, engagement, and high performance. Here are three guidelines to better transparency:

Transparency Builds Trust (And Trust Builds Everything Else)

Here’s the thing: employees don’t follow leaders they don’t trust.They may comply and conform but they do not engage and give their best effort.  And trust doesn’t happen in a vacuum—it’s built through consistent, transparent communication. Whether it’s sharing tough decisions, explaining the “why” behind strategy shifts, or openly discussing challenges, leaders need to be clear and direct. The more transparent leaders are, the more people will trust their decisions, even when they’re tough ones.

Common Non-Transparent Approach: Leaders avoid discussing upcoming changes in staffing until the last minute.

Transparent Version: Leaders openly share that staffing adjustments are being considered early on, even if the specifics aren’t yet decided, explaining the business needs driving the discussions.

Common Non-Transparent Approach: Leaders only communicate results after the fact, without any prior insight into key decisions.

Transparent Version: Leaders communicate about the decision-making process while it’s happening, seeking input from their teams and giving updates as decisions evolve.

No, You Don’t Have to Share Everything

But let’s be real: transparency doesn’t mean you have to turn every meeting into a tell-all. It’s about sharing the right information at the right time. Focus on being clear about decision-making processes, goals, and expectations.  How was the decision made?  Who was involved?  What are we achieving by making this decision?  How does it meet a need?  Why now? If your team understands the rationale behind what’s happening, they’re more likely to support it—even if they don’t agree with every detail.

Common Non-Transparent Approach: Leaders withhold financial performance details from their teams until quarterly results are released, leaving them in the dark about how they’re doing.

Transparent Version: Leaders share monthly performance updates, even if the numbers aren’t perfect, explaining how the team’s efforts are impacting results and what adjustments are being made.

Common Non-Transparent Approach: Leaders delegate tasks without explaining the purpose or reasoning behind them, leaving employees feeling like they’re working in the dark.

Transparent Version: Leaders take time to explain the “why” behind each task or project, helping employees understand how their work ties into broader goals and why it matters.

Transparency is a Two-Way Street

Transparency also means being open to feedback. Leaders need to know what is working and not. Feedback helps them improve their own and their group’s performance. Encourage your leaders to create a culture where employees feel comfortable raising concerns and asking questions. The more open the lines of communication, the better your organization will be at navigating change and staying aligned. Opening the door to feedback often starts with being vulnerable and sharing that something has not gone well. A client of mine recently had to make some difficult decisions for the organization. They seemed to come out of left field and transparency was difficult.  Employee engagement plummeted after this event.  At a company-wide meeting a couple months later, the CEO was very transparent about the impact of the event on employee engagement and asked for feedback on how to help move the organization forward. Afterwards, the feedback started and he listened, beginning the process of improving engagement.

Common Non-Transparent Approach: Leaders shut down feedback by responding defensively or dismissively when employees raise concerns.

Transparent Version: Leaders actively encourage feedback, even if it’s critical, and take the time to listen carefully before responding with thoughtful action or further clarification.

Common Non-Transparent Approach: Leaders hide behind email or formal memos, avoiding direct communication with teams, especially during difficult times.

Transparent Version: Leaders prioritize face-to-face (or virtual face-to-face) communication, especially during challenging situations, offering clarity and being available for open discussion.

Transparency isn’t about oversharing—it’s about building trust by sharing the right information at the right time and being open to dialogue. Leaders who communicate transparently create stronger teams, higher engagement, and more trust throughout the organization. And in today’s world, that’s not just an option—it’s essential.

The Leadership Skills Gap: What’s Missing and How to Fill It

/in , , , , , /by

Future-Proof Your Leadership 

Let’s be real: the leadership skills that got us through the last decade aren’t going to cut it for the next one. The world’s changing too fast, and many of today’s leaders are under-equipped for what’s coming. It’s not just about technical prowess or emotional intelligence—it’s about adapting to a rapidly evolving landscape where leaders need to continuously stretch and grow. So, what’s missing? Let’s dig into the real gaps in leadership and how to fill them.

Gap 1: Adaptive Thinking

The pace of change means leaders can no longer afford to cling to what worked last year (or last week, for that matter). We need leaders who are not just reactive, but proactive—who can anticipate change and pivot before it hits them like a freight train. Adaptive thinking is the ability to solve complex, unpredictable problems on the fly, and it’s one of the most crucial gaps in today’s leadership ranks. Adaptive challenges can’t be solved because you have a particular set of experiences.  Continual learning is key.

How to fill it: Encourage leaders to seek out diverse perspectives regularly—across departments, industries, and markets. Introduce scenario-based planning exercises that require leaders to think several moves ahead, preparing them to react swiftly when the unexpected happens.

Gap 2: Digital Literacy

Yes, your leadership team can probably send an email and hop on a Zoom call, but can they leverage AI to drive decision-making? Do they understand how data analytics can shape strategy? The digital transformation is here, and the leaders who can’t speak the language are going to be left behind. Time to get them up to speed—fast.

How to fill it: Invest in digital upskilling programs for your leaders, whether it’s through external courses or internal workshops. Challenge them to lead data-driven decision-making in their teams by introducing KPIs that are directly tied to digital tools and technologies.

Gap 3: Developing for Growth

Too many leaders are focused on maintaining the status quo or hitting short-term goals, forgetting that leadership is about building for the future. Leaders must not only be good at growing their teams but also at growing themselves. A big gap today is the lack of focus on self-development and mentoring the next generation of leaders.

How to fill it: Role model development for yourself. Let others know how you are continuing to grow and evolve. Implement leadership development plans that include both personal growth and succession planning. Encourage leaders to mentor emerging talent, not just delegate tasks. Track their efforts in developing future leaders as part of their performance metrics.

Gap 4: Real Connection

Building trust and creating a sense of purpose among teams is no longer just a “nice to have.” It’s essential. Leaders today often struggle with truly connecting with their teams in a meaningful way. This is about more than having an “open door policy”; it’s about creating an environment where people feel heard, valued, and inspired by a shared mission.

How to fill it: Train leaders in active listening and emotional intelligence, but go a step further by ensuring they consistently align team objectives with the organization’s broader purpose. Intentionally develop an environment characterized by psychological safety.  Encourage regular one-on-one conversations where leaders focus on understanding their team members’ motivations and personal goals. Building trust is a long game—leaders need to earn it through genuine, consistent engagement.

Gap 5: Performance

It’s easy for leaders to focus on holding their teams accountable, but what about themselves? True leadership isn’t just about managing performance—it’s about creating a culture of mutual accountability where leaders and their teams are aligned on expectations, goals, and progress. A shift in how we lead is holding ourselves accountable to the very people we manage.

How to fill it: Establish regular feedback loops where leaders actively seek input from their teams on their own performance. Encourage leaders to set clear, measurable goals that they are publicly committed to within the team. Create a culture where performance discussions are transparent, and leaders model accountability by owning both successes and areas for improvement.

 

Today’s leadership landscape demands much more than traditional skill sets. Leaders need to think fast, stay digitally savvy, focus on long-term growth, build real connections, and foster a performance-driven culture. By addressing these gaps head-on, we can develop leaders who are not only equipped to navigate change but to thrive in it.

5 Leadership Conversations That Drive Organizational Growth

/in , , , , , , , , , , /by

If We’re Not Talking About These, What Are We Even Doing?

We all know that leadership isn’t about showing up, issuing a few directives, and hoping for the best. Real leadership? It’s a conversation—one that never ends, especially if you’re serious about growth. But not just any chat will do. We’re talking about powerful, sometimes uncomfortable conversations that push your team and your organization forward. Are you ready for them?

Conversation #1: “Here’s What’s Not Working—Let’s Fix It”
Too many leaders dance around the obvious issues. Growth doesn’t happen when everyone’s patting each other on the back. It happens when you call out what’s broken and actively work to fix it. Whether it’s processes, attitudes, or outdated systems, this conversation might sting a little, but trust us, it’s worth the pain.

Conversation #2: “What’s Our Next Big Move?”
Sitting still isn’t an option. Great leaders are always planning the next step—even if the last one hasn’t finished landing yet. Don’t be afraid to challenge your team with big, bold questions. “What’s next?” keeps everyone sharp and keeps your business ahead of the curve. Plus, it’s more exciting than “Let’s just stay the course,” right?

Conversation #3: “How Can I Help You Grow?”
Shocking news: leadership is about your team, not just you. If you’re not regularly asking how you can support your people in their personal and professional growth, you’re missing the mark. No one wants to feel stagnant, and when your team members grow, so does the organization. Simple math.

Conversation #4: “Let’s Talk About Failure”
Guess what? Everyone’s going to fail at some point. Pretending it won’t happen isn’t leadership—it’s delusion. Real leaders talk about failure before it happens, so when it does, it’s a learning moment, not a catastrophe. This conversation builds resilience, encourages risk-taking, and prevents your team from fearing every mistake.

Conversation #5: “Are We Still Aligned?”
Organizations are like marriages—they need constant check-ins. If your leadership team isn’t aligned on the vision, strategy, and values, you’re going to hit some serious turbulence. Make this conversation a regular part of your leadership cadence to ensure everyone’s on the same page, rowing in the same direction, and ready to adapt as needed.

 

Leadership is a dialogue, not a monologue. If you’re not having these conversations, it’s time to get talking. Your organization’s growth depends on it—and frankly, so does your own development as a leader.

 

How to Design an Agile Organizational Structure

/in , , , /by

Because Standing Still is So Last Century

 

In today’s business landscape, staying stagnant is a death sentence. The organizations thriving right now? They’re nimble, they’re agile, and they’re ready to pivot faster than a start-up launching a new app. The key to agility starts with your organizational structure.

Gone are the days of rigid hierarchies where decisions trickle down like molasses. What you need is a structure that doesn’t buckle under the weight of change but bends and flexes with it. Think fewer “command-and-control” towers and more “empowered decision-making” hubs.

Building an agile organization is particularly challenging issue for my rapid-growth life science clients. They feel they’re living the “changing tires while going 85 mph” saying. Here’s some of what I’m encouraging them to do:

3 Steps Closer to an Agile Organization

Flatten the Hierarchy

Let’s be real: no one wants to wait weeks for approvals that could’ve been done over Slack in 30 seconds. Empower your teams with the authority to make decisions quickly, within their domains. Of course, we’re not suggesting anarchy (though that would be fun to watch); clear accountability is still crucial, but trust your people to handle more, and watch them rise to the occasion.

Get started:

  1. Eliminate unnecessary approval layers: Identify and remove at least two approval steps in your current process. This will force faster decision-making and create a culture of ownership at all levels.
  2. Implement a “skip-level” feedback system: Encourage direct communication between front-line employees and senior leaders to eliminate bottlenecks. This bypasses the need for middle management to relay every message and keeps leadership more informed.
  3. Create small, autonomous teams: Restructure departments into cross-functional, self-sufficient teams responsible for their own goals. Give them authority to execute without constant executive oversight.

Embrace Cross-Functional Teams

Why does IT always have to sit in one silo while marketing builds a wall around theirs? Break down the barriers. Create teams that bring together diverse perspectives and skill sets. This fosters innovation and allows your organization to solve problems from all angles. Plus, it’ll stop the “that’s-not-my-department” excuse we’ve all heard one too many times.

Get started:

  1. Mix up your meetings: Mandate that every project meeting include members from at least three different departments with a stake in the outcome. This fosters diverse perspectives and cuts down on siloed thinking.
  2. Launch pilot cross-functional projects: Choose two critical projects and form cross-functional teams to execute them from start to finish. Track the efficiency gains and use them as case studies for expanding the model.
  3. Reward collaboration, not just individual results: Incentivize employees based on the success of the team rather than individual performance alone. This shift in rewards drives teamwork and encourages knowledge sharing across functions.

Prioritize Communication (Seriously)

Agility isn’t just about the org chart—it’s about how information flows. Encourage open, honest communication at all levels. And not just the “nice talk” that comes out of a company-wide email. Real communication happens when leaders listen, employees feel heard, and feedback is acted upon. It’s like therapy for your business, but cheaper.

Get started:

  1. Hold daily 15-minute stand-ups: Require all teams to hold short daily meetings to quickly align on priorities and progress. This promotes transparency and keeps everyone connected, even in fast-moving environments.
  2. Introduce a “one-question” leadership check-in: Leaders should ask one simple, yet powerful question weekly: “What’s one thing I don’t know that I should?” This opens up critical conversations that can uncover hidden issues or opportunities.
  3. Use internal social platforms to promote open dialogue: Encourage the use of tools like Slack or Microsoft Teams for real-time, informal communication across all levels. This helps break down barriers between leadership and teams while fostering a more connected culture.

Remember, agility is less about changing your structure every six months and more about building a structure that’s flexible, adaptable, and ready to tackle whatever’s coming next (spoiler: it’s probably something disruptive). Because standing still? That’s so last century.

How to Get the C-suite on Board?

/in , , , , , , , , /by

Now is the time to invest in leadership development

Cost control efforts, including layoffs, are increasing across multiple industries. Leadership development initiatives can be an easy target. However, this is often the best time to invest in your organization’s leaders, when even more is going to be asked of them. So, how do you get the c-suite on board?

Some of your CEO’s top areas of focus for 2024 are likely to be: attracting and retaining top talent, continue with digital transformation and drive growth – and, you guessed  – reduce costs at the same time (source:  Conference Board 2024 CEO Outlook Report). And, they need leaders who can support these priorities. 

This opens the door for you to guide the c-suite on how to invest limited resources in leadership development that will be most impactful. How do you get the  C-suite’s crucial support for leadership development?

Frame it up: 2 Questions to ask yourself

Start by framing your conversation to address their biggest concern – positively impacting business results.

What is the business case for your organization?  Thinking like a CEO is critical to winning their support.

  • What are executives most concerned about in 2024? In a nutshell, it’s Growth, Technology, and Talent. If you want to dig deeper, take a look at the 2024 CEO Outlook survey from the Conference Board, and the most recent Fortune/Deloitte CEO Survey Insights

  •  Find out not only what is most critical to your c-suite, but how they are talking about it. Be conversant in your company’s mission, business strategy, KPI’s / OKR’s and financial performance. Have direct discussions with senior leaders about what’s critical to them. Be prepared to provide relevant data (employee engagement, client satisfaction, attrition and talent acquisition, absenteeism, etc.). Business strategy documents, annual reports, and formal communications to leaders and employees are also good sources to prepare for discussions.
  • Create a direct link between your organization’s pain pointsand how the leadership development will help ease it. See more below.

What is the ROI / Impact?  If you have been able to demonstrate a strong ROI of past leadership development initiatives at your organization, that’s gold. If you don’t have that data, you can point to studies from reputable organizations that show a link between leadership development and business performance. Use this kind of data sparingly and targeted to your C-suite’s biggest concerns. This graphic from joshbersin.com provides compelling high-level support:

A diagram of a company Description automatically generated

Or some of these statistics could pique their interest:

Talking with the C-suite

In addition to data and framing it up, positioning your business case is critical. Here are some ways to talk with your c-suite about leadership development.

Alignment:“We need to improve our leaders’ ability to align with the organization on business strategy, goals, and culture.”

  • Alignment needs to be regularly reinforced at all levels of the organization, from the most senior leaders to the most junior employees. For example, innovation is one of our core business imperatives. Leaders at all levels need to create environments on their teams where people will share new ideas and step out of old ways of thinking, Strong leadership development can show them how to do this and apply it in their real work.
  • Better aligned leaders make better decisions. They are also faster at adopting new technology.Our business’s innovative strength will be a direct byproduct of helping our leaders and their teams to better align with our business strategy and goals.
  • Leadership development is best when customizedso that critical skills are taught and practiced in ways that reflect our strategy and values. And I will ensure any development program does that.

Engagement:“We know from our engagement surveys, leaders and managers want the organization to invest in them” (if you don’t have engagement surveys, use some of the statistics discussed above). Opportunity for development is one of the top motivating factors listed in virtually all studies and surveys on engagement.

  • The bottom line for better engaged managers and employees is better performance. Teams that are engaged work more productively; they’re more likely to got the extra mile to achieve organizational goals, and they collaborate across teams more willingly.
  • In our continually changing business environment, leaders are desperately looking to boost their ability to stay on top of their people challenges.
  • Developing our leaders has a trickle-down effect on the teams and employees. They will be better led and therefore more engaged themselves. That results in better retention, lower hiring costs, and increased productivity.
  • Showing our leaders how to build empathy and trustwith their team members builds connection and embeds engagement more deeply in the organization.

Performance:  “When our leaders have their teams better aligned and better engaged, they will perform better.”

  • Our leadership development will emphasize effective communication and collaboration, which leads to better working relationships and less operational friction. That means fewer misunderstandings, mistakes, and wasted time and resources.
  • We also need to improve team and individual accountability. That includes mutual accountability amongst team members and their leaders. When leaders share more accountably with their teams, it drives engagement and performance.
Growth:  “When our leaders are better aligned with our strategy, and have more engaged and productive teams… they will be better able to help grow the business. Their professional growth helps drives team and organizational growth.”
  • Leadership development hones skills like adaptability and continual learning. That helps create an organization that is agile in the face of constant change.
  • Over time it builds muscle-memory for how to shift gears quickly and effectively from one business imperative to a more urgent or critical one.
  • Well-developed leaders are also better at identifying organizational growth opportunities and mitigating risks that threaten that growth.

Of course, you will find language and examples to make this framework more specific to your organization. That will make it resonate more with your senior leaders.

The value of effective leadership development is that it supports and accelerates the business strategy. It helps create a culture of adaptability and innovation. All of which helps your organization stay competitive in relentlessly changing markets.

All of which makes leadership development a wise investment, and not merely a cost.

Contact us for more information on how we can help you build leaders who enhance connection, performance and growth in your business.

Does Your Business Discourage Dissent?

/in , , , , , , , , , /by
Diversity of experience and ideas, like other types of diversity, are critical to the success of your business. Even with a deep connection to your mission and strong leadership, an insular approach to strategy and decision-making can leave you vulnerable. It can hinder your ability to see early warning signals in the market or changes in customer profiles, and it becomes too easy to believe that past success will almost guarantee future success.
.
In her recently published article from Harvard Business Review, Edith Onderick-Harvey provides some practical insights into how to ensure your organization stays resilient. The article was written for the family business audience, but the challenges and solutions are applicable to virtually all organizations.
.
By Edith Onderick-Harvey

Who’s Going Back to the Office? Who *Should* Be Going Back?

/in , , , , , , , , , , /by

It’s usually not a simple choice – for companies or for individuals. Companies are making very different decisions. If you’re unsure who should go back to the office, how many days per week, and to do what type of work… here’s a bit of help.

Companies are making very different decisions.

Many people are thinking about being back in the office and what post-pandemic work life looks like. They’re asking questions like “why do I need to be in the office? When do I need to be back in the office? Why aren’t we all back in the office?”

The answers seem as varied as the people asking them. We are hearing weekly what different companies are doing, and the decisions are far from consistent.

  • The largest 4-day work week pilot to date is underway in the UK. For six months, 3,300 people, in 70 companies, across a wide variety of industries are testing the feasibility of a 4-day work week. During the program, workers receive 100% of their pay for working only 80% of their usual week, in exchange for promising to maintain 100% of their productivity. Joe O’Connor, CEO of 4 Day Week Global says “More and more companies are recognizing that the new frontier for competition is quality of life, and that reduced-hour, productivity-focused working is the vehicle to give them that competitive edge,”
  • Elon Musk made news because of a leaked internal memo to Tesla workersin which he says “Anyone who wishes to do remote work must be in the office for a minimum (and I mean *minimum*) of 40 hours per week or depart Tesla… not a remote branch office unrelated to the job duties.’ His reasoning seems to be that by not being in the office at least 40-hours per week, you are “phoning it in.”
  • Akamai went in the opposite direction. Full disclosure – I’ve had the privilege of working with them several times. They announced that as of May 2022, 95% of their nearly 10,000 employees around the world have complete flexibility to decide whether they work at home, in the office, or both. In making this decision, they analyzed all roles in the company against the same criteria, regardless of location, and determined 95% could be done with complete flexibility. Flexibility has been part of their culture for years but never to this extent. The analysis bolstered their belief that employees should decide what is best for them.
So, who’s doing what?  A Robin survey of more than 10,000 offices globally found that:
  • Nearly 20 percent of American office workers are back one day a week
  • About 10 percent are back two days a week
  • Just five percent are back three days a week
  • Even fewer are back four or five days a week
  • More than 50 percent do not use the office consistently every week.

The idea of everyone needing to be in the office or at the same site goes back to the industrial and pre-digital work environment. Materials were most efficiently used in a single location. Communication happened face-to-face or by phone. In my early consulting career, I worked for a firm where a large percentage of the consultants coded all day – onsite, in person. The technology was different then so there really wasn’t another option. However, these people spent 90% of their time in their cubes, working individually. With today’s digital environments, you could easily see that being in-person would probably be of little impact on their work.

Recent research finds that working collaboratively face-to-face (F2F) has an impact on creativity. A study of nearly 1,500 engineers in five different countries were randomly paired to create product ideas F2F or via video call. The study showed video conferencing had a negative impact on idea generation but did not make a difference in the ability to critically evaluate creative ideas. Since creativity begins with new or adaptive ideas, face-to-face could be critical to your innovation and problem-solving strategies.

What’s the right model for how we work? Different companies will have different needs, jobs will have different needs, people will have different needs. And, that’s a new way of thinking.  Many roles are much more nuanced than the coder example I shared above, so the choice is not that simple. It will take months, probably years before we understand the benefits and drawbacks of any model. At the end of the day, the answer will probably be, it depends.

“It depends” is not a great response for people seeking answers.  So, here’s a little help figuring things out. If you and your team are still deciding how to manage the Great Transition, you may want to start with looking at the nature of the work. Even if your organization is committed to a consistent hybrid model (i.e., everyone in the office 2 days per week), it may help you determine how to use those in-office days vs remote days.

You can start with a simple 2×3 matrix that allows you to map tasks to three task categories – creative, analytical, or transactional/process — and the degree of interactivity associated with the task – is it primarily individual or collaborative, and the amount of your time you spend on each task.

For example, if I am analyzing the data in a spreadsheet, it is primarily an individual task. If I am one of several people brainstorming a new solution, working collaboratively on this analysis will generate better results. Analyzing different solutions may work as well remotely as FTF depending on the nature of what’s being analyzed.  Also, creative and analytical processes can be co-dependent and concurrent, so working collaboratively, FTF on this analysis might generate better results. Think of this as a continuum between Creative and Transactional.

Here’s an example, below:

We’re working with leaders, teams and organizations right now helping them be successful in the new world of work through customizable programs and consulting engagements.  How can we help you?

What’s Going On With You? A Little Introspection Can Improve Personal Performance

/in , , , , , , , , , /by

Recently, I’ve been talking with leaders, including mid-level leaders, about the challenges they are facing with staff shortages, continued ambiguity from COVID, and end of year pressures. In these conversations, the underlying theme is the toll these issues are taking on their emotions and their continual effort to push those emotions away or to simply plow through them.

The context for these conversations is a broader discussion about leading with emotional agility. Susan David and Christina Congleton, in their Harvard Business Review article, define emotional agility as the ability to manage one’s thoughts and feelings in a mindful, productive way. When most of us get hooked by our negative thoughts, especially at work, we have one of two reactions. We buy into them (“I always do something stupid that gets in the way of my success.”) and avoid the situations that may evoke them. Or, we rationalize them away (“I shouldn’t have these thoughts. Just get on with it.”)

When we get hooked and choose one of these two common reactions, we are not giving ourselves the opportunity to respond effectively and intentionally. To choose to respond rather than react, the first step you must take is to recognize what is going on with you.

When I talk with these leaders, I ask them how many times a day they check in with themselves to assess what they are feeling. The overwhelming response is never. Some will say rarely. A very small fraction will say regularly. Then we do the following exercise:

First, we pause the conversation right there and I give them 30 seconds to just stop and check in with themselves.

Before the pause, I encourage them to work hard to accurately name what they are feeling. Don’t just tell themselves they are feeling stressed. Rather become more granular in the assessment. Are you angry? Frustrated? Overwhelmed? Constrained? To respond, rather than react, the first step is to accurately identify and understand what you are feeling. You can’t create an effective response or strategy if you are unable to clearly define what you are responding to.

At the end of 30 seconds, I ask them about their experience. They often say it makes them feel more centered, have more clarity, and are better able to manage those emotions than have the emotions manage them. It provides them the space to choose a response.

We then discuss how pausing 1-2 times a day – taking 1 minute out of an 8, 10 or 12 hour workday– can significantly impact the ability to become more emotionally agile and the impact of that agility on their ability to lead in challenging times.

Over the next few weeks, take a moment or two throughout the day to check in with yourself. What are you feeling? How are you reacting to those emotions? What opportunities do you have to pause to make the choice of how you will respond?

These are stressful times. You’ll find that this technique also works quite well at home.